Hi mate. :-) I hope you're recovering well. I'm writing because I'm from Brisbane, not too far from UQ. Also had surgery recently a detached retina, and needed overnight in hospital. It worked well, thank goodness. Hasn't the Sabine video caused a stir all over. Deniers hate it, and "conservative/traditionalist" celebrity climate scientists as well.
Anyway, really liked you comment -- because it is true and correct. AS usual they only focus on misusing any story to "double down on the ('super accuracy' claims of the) IPCC" and it's supposed amazing reliability. I'd reply their but can't. :-)
So I decided to do it here. Also I agree with Leon Simons recently (co-author with Hansen).... these climate scientists are negligent and responsible for great harm.
This showed up again Halim. YOu might find it insightful, from 2015 - much truer today than it was then - https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a36228/ballad-of-the-sad-climatologists-0815/ - but now we have the impacts and effects of their silence and downplaying the consequences and the futility of their fantasy "plans to solve the problems" - we are in dire straits.
Thanks. I am recovering well I think. I will see the surgeon for follow-up and hopefully for closure in a few weeks time.
I get disappointed with climate scientists who choose to become advocates. There is nothing wrong with advocacy but I would like them offer some qualified discussion of the uncertainties as well. I do not have the competence to do such analysis but I can probably understand and appreciate it when I read it.
Hi mate. :-) I hope you're recovering well. I'm writing because I'm from Brisbane, not too far from UQ. Also had surgery recently a detached retina, and needed overnight in hospital. It worked well, thank goodness. Hasn't the Sabine video caused a stir all over. Deniers hate it, and "conservative/traditionalist" celebrity climate scientists as well.
Halim, I saw your comment https://www.theclimatebrink.com/p/a-primer-on-atmospheric-rivers/comment/49067480 -- I liked it. I made several posts on their "hot models" article which got me banned. Oh well, some people cannot handle direct criticism of what they say and what they represent.
Anyway, really liked you comment -- because it is true and correct. AS usual they only focus on misusing any story to "double down on the ('super accuracy' claims of the) IPCC" and it's supposed amazing reliability. I'd reply their but can't. :-)
So I decided to do it here. Also I agree with Leon Simons recently (co-author with Hansen).... these climate scientists are negligent and responsible for great harm.
This showed up again Halim. YOu might find it insightful, from 2015 - much truer today than it was then - https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a36228/ballad-of-the-sad-climatologists-0815/ - but now we have the impacts and effects of their silence and downplaying the consequences and the futility of their fantasy "plans to solve the problems" - we are in dire straits.
Take care, Sean
Thanks. I am recovering well I think. I will see the surgeon for follow-up and hopefully for closure in a few weeks time.
I get disappointed with climate scientists who choose to become advocates. There is nothing wrong with advocacy but I would like them offer some qualified discussion of the uncertainties as well. I do not have the competence to do such analysis but I can probably understand and appreciate it when I read it.
Anyway, thank you for your commentary. Keep well.